Socratic clinical reasoning
Clinical reasoning, taught the Socratic way.
Learners work through real published cases with an AI attending that asks instead of tells. Instructors write the cases, assign them with a code, and see how each learner reasoned.
Cases adapted from open-access literature · reviewed by physicians · an educational tool, not medical advice.
How it works
The case unfolds as you reason.
- 01
Pick a case
Real, de-identified cases adapted from the published clinical literature — across immunology, allergy, and beyond. You get the briefing the clinician first saw, nothing more.
- 02
Reason out loud
A Socratic attending asks questions instead of handing you answers. History, examination findings, and investigations unlock as you think to ask for them — just like real workup.
- 03
Get a debrief
When you close the case, a structured assessment scores your reasoning across dimensions, reveals the resolution, and shows the concepts you missed.
For instructors
Your cases, your class, their reasoning.
Turn a case you already teach into a Socratic session, assign it to your students, and read how they got to the answer — not just whether they did.
- 01
Author a case in minutes
Start from an open-access case report and let the AI draft the Socratic version. You decide what unlocks when, and the diagnosis stays sealed until the learner commits. Test-run it before anyone sees it.
- 02
Assign it with a code
Group cases into a pool and hand your class one code. Everyone who redeems it gets the pool on their home page — and attempts made there count only there.
- 03
See how they reasoned
A class report shows every learner's best attempt per case, scored across reasoning dimensions, next to their pre- and post-quiz results.
- 04
Quizzes, generated
One click drafts a pre- and post-quiz for the case; you edit the questions in place and keep what you like.
Sign up as an instructor — no approval step, no card.
| Case 3 | Case 7 | Case 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learner 1 | 82% | 74% | — |
| Learner 2 | 68% | 91% | 77% |
| Learner 3 | — | 59% | 85% |
Pitched to your level
One case, calibrated to you.
You choose your level, and the attending calibrates how much it scaffolds and how hard it pushes.
Students
Heavily scaffolded — terms defined as they come up, one focused question at a time.
Residents
Structured reasoning expected, basics assumed; pushed on the diagnostic thread.
Fellows
Terse and demanding — edge cases, ambiguity, and the limits of the evidence.